Reflecting on the 2025 NBA Awards Season and Its Implications

The conclusion of the 2025 NBA awards season followed the announcement of the league's All-NBA and All-Defensive teams. While identifying the winners—those who received awards—and the losers—those who did not—is straightforward, the implications are more complex. The future assessment of various awards may be influenced by these announcements, with some teams and players experiencing significant financial impacts as a result. The following sections outline the key winners and losers of the awards season.
The All-Rookie First Team comprised Stephon Castle, Zaccharie Risacher, Jaylen Wells, Zach Edey, and Alex Sarr, while the Second Team included Matas Buzelis, Bub Carrington, Donovan Clingan, Kel’el Ware, and Yves Missi. For the All-Defensive First Team, the selections were Evan Mobley, Draymond Green, Dyson Daniels, Lu Dort, and Amen Thompson, with the Second Team featuring Toumani Camara, Rudy Gobert, Jaren Jackson Jr., Jalen Williams, and Ivica Zubac. The All-NBA First Team saw Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Nikola Jokic, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Jayson Tatum, and Donovan Mitchell honored, followed by the Second Team, which included Jalen Brunson, Stephen Curry, Anthony Edwards, LeBron James, and Evan Mobley, and the Third Team with Cade Cunningham, Tyrese Haliburton, James Harden, Karl-Anthony Towns, and Jalen Williams.
Historically, discussions surrounding the NBA MVP award often reduce the analysis to the question of which player belonged to the best team, often without considering other crucial factors. Although this line of thinking has its supporters, it does not always yield the most accurate assessment of a player's value. The outcome of the 2024-25 MVP vote may exemplify this scenario. The Oklahoma City Thunder, while successful, did not fit the mold of a traditional 'best team' for the season, breaking records for single-season point differential and the number of double-digit and 15-point wins. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's individual plus-minus of 918 ranks as the fifth highest on record, trailing only three seasons from Stephen Curry and Draymond Green's 2015-16 campaign. He also led the league in estimated plus-minus and total points scored by a margin exceeding 300. Though Gilgeous-Alexander's case for MVP is grounded in more than just his team's performance, his victory may reinforce the argument that being the ‘best player on the best team’ is a valid criterion for evaluating this award. Unfortunately, some prominent figures in discussions about the MVP have overly simplified the debate regarding Gilgeous-Alexander by stating that while Nikola Jokic may be the best player, Shai is the most valuable. This dichotomy fails to explore the nuances between 'best' and 'most valuable,' often ending discussion without thorough examination of what constitutes 'value' within the MVP context. Clearly, these debates warrant more profound scrutiny, as many questions remain unaddressed. For instance, does Jokic's triple-double average, scoring efficiency, and higher net rating swing diminish Gilgeous-Alexander's chances? Furthermore, should voter fatigue and historical trends factor into the evaluation? The depth of analysis is essential in discussions of this caliber, yet often overlooked.
The MVP discourse encapsulates a range of divergent issues, with strong arguments in favor of both Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander. This lack of a definitive answer reflects broader subjectivity surrounding various award categories, especially given the current depth and talent in the NBA. Noteworthy performances by players like Evan Mobley, who won Defensive Player of the Year, could also be subject to scrutiny. Despite his accolades, Mobley is not ranked first in defensive estimated plus-minus, and his team ranks eighth in points allowed per 100 possessions. Conversely, Dyson Daniels made headlines by averaging 3.0 steals, marking the highest figure in over three decades, while Draymond Green's versatility contributed to the Golden State Warriors boasting the league's best defense post-trade deadline. In addition, the Clutch Player of the Year award might have resulted in a different outcome had voters prioritized playmaking and defensive contributions over scoring, potentially favoring Jokic over Jalen Brunson. The conversation extends to Most Improved Player and Rookie of the Year considerations, indicating that different criteria could lead to alternate results, yet none of the actual results stand as demonstrably incorrect. This serves to illustrate the individual contributions of players in a league brimming with talent, ultimately benefiting fans watching the game unfold.
Under the current collective bargaining agreement, player salaries are directly linked to individual accolades, particularly for young players entering their second NBA contracts. A case in point is Evan Mobley, who, after clinching the Defensive Player of the Year award, now qualifies for a salary at 30 percent of the salary cap for the 2025-26 season, amounting to $46.4 million, compared to the $38.7 million he would have earned at 25 percent. Over the next five years, Mobley stands to gain an additional $44.8 million, which will impact the Cleveland Cavaliers' financial strategies as they work to retain the promising young star. This heightened salary could significantly affect team-building efforts, forcing the Cavaliers to navigate tighter financial constraints while aiming for sustained success. In contrast, Cade Cunningham's designation to the Third Team All-NBA alongside Mobley grants him a similar financial boost as both players transition from 25 percent to 30 percent of the cap. Notably, the Detroit Pistons are not constrained by as many significant contracts, allowing them flexibility as they prepare for a hopeful playoff future. Several other noteworthy players, including Jaren Jackson Jr., Scottie Barnes, and Franz Wagner, may have missed out on potential larger contracts for failing to secure All-NBA recognitions. Wagner, in particular, missed the 65-game threshold for individual awards due to a midseason injury, leaving him eligible only for the 25 percent allocation. The implications extend to Jackson Jr. and Trae Young, where the absence of All-NBA honors renders them ineligible for maximum contract extensions, limiting Young's potential earnings to around $229 million for four years.
Lastly, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s receipt of the MVP title solidifies his standing for a significant five-year, $380 million contract. His availability for games has been consistent, leading to projections that he could earn over $1 million per game if his pace holds, marking a shift toward unprecedented individual contracts in the league. As the NBA progresses into an era characterized by exceptional financial opportunities for standout players, figures like Gilgeous-Alexander are pioneering this new landscape.








