Changes to NHL Collective Bargaining Agreement: A New Development Path for Prospects

The current NHL collective bargaining agreement (CBA) is set to expire in September 2026. This date raises concerns for those familiar with the league's history, particularly given past labor disputes. However, recent developments suggest a potential for stability, as owners and the NHL Players' Association have reached an agreement on the framework of a new CBA.
One significant change anticipated in the forthcoming CBA pertains to the assignment of young players. According to insights from NHL insider Frank Seravalli, each NHL team will have the opportunity to assign one 19-year-old prospect to their AHL affiliate each season. This policy could impact a maximum of 32 players annually, and while it may seem minor at first glance, its implications for player development are profound. Currently, prospects drafted from Canadian major junior leagues—specifically the OHL, WHL, or QMJHL—must be either 20 years old or have completed four seasons in the CHL before they can be assigned to the AHL or ECHL. This change could significantly alter the trajectory of young players as it allows for earlier professional experience.
For instance, Vancouver Canucks prospect Braeden Cootes, who will turn 19 in February 2026, could potentially be assigned to the Abbotsford Canucks later that year, should the team determine that his development is best served outside of the WHL. This rule change, which is based on age rather than draft year, means that a newly drafted player who turns 19 shortly after being selected could bypass their junior team entirely. A notable example is Ryan Roobroeck, a top prospect eligible for the 2026 draft. If he signs his entry-level contract immediately and participates in his team's development camp, Roobroeck could be assigned directly to the AHL instead of returning to the Niagara IceDogs of the OHL. This development path could offer a critical advantage, particularly for those who find themselves overly mature for junior hockey but not quite ready for the NHL.
While this new assignment option does offer benefits, it also introduces challenges for Canadian junior teams. NHL teams can utilize this rule to bring key prospects closer to home, allowing for more direct observation and easier call-ups. However, CHL teams may be adversely affected, especially given that there appears to be no cap on how many players NHL teams may select from a single CHL team each year. As a result, junior teams may find themselves vulnerable, losing top talents to the AHL's playing field without any significant compensation.
Nevertheless, this shift could significantly alter the status quo for prospects in the CHL. With this new system in place, players can pursue professional opportunities earlier, minimizing the risks associated with returning to junior hockey. The historical implications of being stuck between junior and professional levels could potentially be alleviated, allowing players to refine their abilities in the more competitive AHL environment. This development could serve teams like the OHL's London Knights, who are consistently strong yet may not present the same level of challenges for their players, thereby inhibiting growth.
The newfound ability for 19-year-olds to transition into the AHL opens up a new realm of possibilities for both players and NHL teams alike. According to prospect writer Scott Wheeler from The Athletic, many agents have indicated that their players would prefer the CHL-to-AHL route, particularly when considering the financial benefits associated with signing bonuses and guaranteed salaries. The decision to forgo college options under the new CBA may very well hinge on how attractive these structures are compared to their NCAA counterparts. As the landscape of player development continues to evolve, this CBA change marks a pivotal moment in how young talent is nurtured within professional hockey.








